I had worked with a very diverse staff of 10 other college students and a central Residential Director who served as a staff manager and the liaison to upper levels of University Housing Staff. University Housing is a highly decentralized institution with multiple tiers of administration from the main director of University Housing to student paraprofessionals. The institutional hierarchy of University Housing was incredibly extensive. University Housing was very unique in the scope of its activities, providing residents of the University not only with a residence hall, but also affiliating with dining services, technological and academic resources, facilitating student employment as well as renting out available spaces in residence and dining halls for events and meetings.
Residential Advisors served as the
face of University Housing. As a residential advisor I was trained through
the Course EOL 199 and three weeks of onsite training. Residential
Advisors act as a mentor, emergency responder, and academic advisor for student
residents of University Housing. As an employee
of University Housing, I gained very valuable insight into the process and
daily operation of such large and important University of Illinois entities.
Decentralization of Housing was crucial to effectively meet the needs of University
of Illinois students. Yet information asymmetries often enhanced the difficulty
of the position of an RA. The dispersal
of information from upper levels of Housing was often slow coming to RA who
were the primary actors dispersing the information. I often found it challenging
to enforce rules and regulations dictated by the administration University
Housing due to incomplete information. As well, due to the massive structure of
Housing it was often a very complicated and timely process to get into contact
with and communicate with Housing Administration on any particular issue in
residential life.
Transaction costs also played a
major role in the organization of University Housing and were particularly
prevalent to the job description of a Residential Advisor. Beyond
community-building, providing networking and social opportunities and serving
as a guide to campus life at U of I, residential advisors bore the main brunt
of transaction costs incurred in the market of University Housing. RAs serve to
reduce transaction costs in the market exchange between students and student housing
administration. Policing and enforcing came into play whenever Residential Advisors
handled paperwork for Housing administration, such as distributing and
collecting student “room condition reports” and performing mid-semester fire inspections to ensure that
students are upholding fire safety regulations specified in their housing
contract. As well in building a community within a residence hall, RAs were
responsible, along with residents to compile community rules to be respected
throughout the year in order to provide the fullest and best living experience
for all residents in the residence hall. Developing community rules incurred a
good deal of bargaining costs in the process of compromising upon the personal living
preferences of the more than 40 women living on my floor to establish an middle
path equitable to all involved,
Before commenting on the substance of your post, let me note that the purpose of using the alias is so your own identity would remain private. So I suggest you change the user name to your alias. (Go to the Blogger Dashboard. Find your profile in the upper right. Then click Edit Profile.)
ReplyDeleteNote that Robert Giffen also posted about working for Housing. You might have a look at his post to compare notes. You say you got intensive training but that the structure of the organization is very decentralized. Let me say how I read that and see if you agree with the interpretation.
The training gives you guidelines about how to perform in a situation where a student has an issue. Those guidelines are usually not so clear cut to completely prescribe your response to the issue. So within the broad framework that the training gives you, there is still room to exercise substantial discretion on how to deal with the issue. Is that a good interpretation?